LogiCov, Inc.
Institutional credit analysis without giving away the book.
Turns a 2-3 week credit file into a 2-3 hour desktop underwrite. Ingestion and synthesis, in your tenant, on your policy. One client's files, rule book, and memo language never touch another client's. Your data is never used to train anyone else's model.
Cycle time
2-3 weeks → 2-3 hours
The gap
Why the obvious tools do not work
Rated-public tools
Strong on rated publics. Weak on unrated publics and NDA privates, which is where most of the book actually sits.
Public AI / generic GenAI
Uploading NDA financials into a public model is a compliance event, not a productivity win.
We will build it with you vendors
The client funds the work. The vendor keeps the method and sells it to the next institution.
Institutions want AI and legally cannot use the obvious tools.
Ownership
Your memo. Your policy. Your tenant.
Your Data
Files stay in your tenant. Nothing is pooled across clients.
Your IP
Your policy, template, and memo language remain yours.
Your Environment
Single-tenant by design. No shared workspace.
Your Memory
Prior files and decisions compound inside your environment.
Memory stays with you. Processing does not leave a copy behind.
Containment
Same task. Two very different paths.
Containment, not a smarter model.
Drop it in a model
One prompt carries the file, the policy, the industry question, and the memo ask. The file leaves the workflow boundary. The model can answer outside the question. There is no separate check before the draft exists.
One window. No harness. No owner.
Narrow agents, one tenant
The file stays inside the institution's environment. A financial agent only spreads. An industry agent only reads the sector. A policy agent only checks their rule book. A guardian agent reviews before a human signs. Nothing is pooled. The analyst still submits to committee.
Each agent does one job. The institution owns the conclusion.
A general model is built for every question. This is built for one file: their policy, their template, their tenant. The draft does not wander into a chat.
LogiCov harness
File in
Narrow agents
Spread, sector, policy
Guardian check
Kill switch. A reviewer can stop the draft before it exists. Nothing leaves the tenant.
Human sign-off
Committee
Ingestion and synthesis. The institution owns the credit conclusion.
Fit with the program
A desk win the transformation office can absorb
The enterprise AI program
- Multi-year, multi-use-case.
- Owned by IT.
- Slow to reach credit.
- Files still cannot go into public tools while it is being built.
What the credit desk needs
- One workflow this month.
- Policy-aligned desktop underwrites on publics, unrated publics, and NDA privates.
- Isolated tenant.
- No dependency on the platform program.
LogiCov is not a rival to the transformation program. It is a contained production use case the credit team can run now and the transformation office can adopt later. It does not wait on the enterprise platform and it does not interfere with it.
Outcomes
What changes when the file is measured in hours
2-3 weeks to 2-3 hours
Cycle time on a desktop underwrite.
Capacity
Analyst throughput without linear headcount.
Consistency
The same policy checks run on every file.
Institutional intelligence
Prior files and decisions stay in their tenant and route the specialist check to the desk that has seen that credit before. A trade-finance office and an ag office do not see each other's book. Audit can still find the odd file, because the pattern lives in the same institution. Construction default patterns and luxury-homebuilder default patterns stay on their book. Agents get better on their files. Nothing is pooled across clients.
95% final-ready
Source-cited draft, ready for human review.
No leakage
NDA files never enter a public model.
2-4 weeks
Live in a pilot, not a program.
A regional-bank analyst, fully loaded, is about $300-350k. Ten analysts is $3.5-4 million before a file is improved. Intake to a source-cited draft in hours, not two to three weeks.
Scale deal flow without scaling headcount.
Workflow
How the work runs
01
Upload financials
PDFs, Excel, data-room drop. Messy files are fine.
02
Entity confirm
Legal name, ticker, corporate tree. The file is attached to the right obligor.
03
Agent review
Spread, policy checks, discrepancy flags, source citations.
04
Desktop underwrite
Committee-format draft. 95% final-ready for the analyst.
We do not redesign the credit culture. We remove the grunt work in front of it. The analyst still owns the call.
Product simulation
A desktop underwrite, start to draft
Sample output. Public company. Generic Codex. Occidental Petroleum (NYSE: OXY). Full files are shown live on a name from your book.
Generating desktop underwrite
Occidental Petroleum Corporation
- Ticker / legal name OXY confirmed
- 10-K / 10-Q ingested
- Spreading agent running
- Policy / rating agent running
- Reviewer agent checking consistency
- Draft ready · 95% final-ready for human review
Who runs it
Same product, different job
Commercial Banks
A committee-ready first pass in hours, inside the bank's own policy.
ViewPrivate Credit
Screening memos that sound like your team, ready the same day.
ViewCorporate Treasury & Credit
Limit files that hold up in review without a two week wait.
ViewTrading Houses
Counterparty coverage that keeps pace with the trading book.
ViewInsurers
Policy-locked files with the evidence attached.
ViewFamily Offices
Institutional output without institutional headcount.
ViewSpecialty Lending
A credible first look before the deal team commits weeks.
ViewAdvisory
Faster client turnarounds with your method kept in-house.
ViewAdjacent outcomes
After the memo exists in the tenant, teams naturally get a shared workspace, prior-file memory, and a cleaner book.
These are outcomes of using the platform. They are not separate modules to buy.
Built from the chair
Kristopher Sherman, CEO
Kristopher Sherman, CEO. 20+ years in institutional credit and commodity risk, including as a director of risk on a major-bank commodity desk. LogiCov was built from the chair because the file was always the bottleneck, not the judgment.
Insights
Notes from the desk
Note 01
Credit teams are not short on judgment. They are buried in glorified data-janitor work.
